Commit Graph
27 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
WorkBuddy 3c2b967274 release: freeze 2026-10-15 validated release baseline
CI/CD Pipeline / UI Contracts (source-structure gates) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI/CD Pipeline / E2E (live stack) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI/CD Pipeline / Backend Build & Test (push) Canceled after 0s
CI/CD Pipeline / Admin Web Build (push) Canceled after 0s
CI/CD Pipeline / Mini Program Compile Check (push) Canceled after 0s
CI/CD Pipeline / Migration Validation (push) Canceled after 0s
CI/CD Pipeline / Test Shell Guard (Phase 23 Gate) (push) Canceled after 0s
2026-10-15 09:47:31 +08:00
WorkBuddy ef61d51f61 fix(audit,matchmaker): V057 audit_logs 增加 subject_user_id 主体维度(运行时实测抓到 C 端审计 FK 硬缺陷)
- 根因:audit_logs.operator_id FK→operators,C 端用户(consent/decline/越权)触发的审计把 userId 写 operator_id → FK violation:consent 成功路径 500 回滚(阻塞主链路)、deny 路径写失败被吞(C 端越权零审计,违反 DEC-006);H2 无 FK → 集成测试假绿(测试库缺约束类假绿第二例)
- V057:audit_logs + subject_user_id UUID FK users(可空)+ idx_audit_logs_subject_user;主体语义=operator_id 与 subject_user_id 恰有一者非空
- AuditLog 实体 +subjectUserId;DataScopeGuard.denyUser(subject 维度 deny,先审计后 403);AuditLogService.recordUserAction 备用入口
- ContactAuthorizationService:consent/decline 改 saveUserAudit(subject 维度);requireOwnedAuthorization 改 denyUser;operator 侧 6 处不变
- 测试:生命周期断言主体分流(consent 行 subject_user_id/operator_id=null/无 assignment_id);非本人 consent 负例补「越权 deny 审计必须落 subject 维度」断言;LATEST_MIGRATION 56→57
- 验证:定向 33/33(授权 13+disabled 2+守卫 5+迁移 13);负向注入 denyUser 写回 operator 维度 → 恰好新断言判红 → 还原复绿
- 发现渠道:本地栈运行时实测(mock 登录新用户 consent 403 → deny 审计 FK 失败日志溯源)
2026-10-12 10:15:46 +08:00
WorkBuddy d3735e3afa feat(matchmaker,contactauth): 受控联系授权机制立项落地(OQ-MATCHMAKER-003 / DEC-MATCHMAKER-003 B1 例外通道)
后端:
- V056 matchmaker_contact_authorizations 表:channel CHECK(phone/offline_meeting/full_contact)、六态状态机(pending_approval→pending_consent→active→expired/revoked, →rejected)、部分唯一索引 uq_mm_contact_auth_active 防同红娘-同用户-同渠道多 ACTIVE、双态惰性收敛(active 过期 + pending_consent 超同意窗口)
- ContactAuthorizationConfig 五 canonical key(matchmaker.contact.*):enabled 代码缺省 false fail-safe(yml 显式 true)/approver-authorities 双岗并列/consent-deadline-hours 72/default-validity-days 7/retention-days 365,全部 DEFAULT+CONFIG 待产品+法务终审
- ContactAuthorizationPolicy.assertContactAllowed(404 化 deny 先审计后 404) + canContact 徽标查询
- ContactAuthorizationService:request(须有效分配+purpose 必填)/approve(权限码动态判定∈配置+组长组织范围)/consent(用户本人,仅 pending_consent)/decline/revoke(reason 必填)/disclose(唯一披露出口:enabled fail-safe→assertActiveAssignment→assertContactAllowed→仅返回 phone/disclosedAt/authorizationId 三键,每次落 SensitiveAccessLog user_phone_disclosure,phone 不落应用日志)
- 双控制器:运营端 /operator/matchmaker/contact-authorizations + C 端 /contact-authorizations(UserPrincipal 归属校验,独立端点无预同意参数),不碰 SecurityConfig

守卫翻转(机械锁强制复审机制按设计生效):
- MatchmakerContactGuardTest 由「锁不存在」翻转为「锁新契约」五条:回显白名单类收敛/端点前缀收敛(受治理三包)/到期语义/consent 独立性三端扫描(后端+miniapp+admin-web,修复原只扫后端的预同意参数逃逸缺口)/ReferralService 白名单与无 @Scheduled 保留
- run-backend-contracts CURATED 18→20

前端:
- miniapp 新页 pages/contact-consent(目的/渠道/窗口明示+独立同意拒绝按钮无预勾选,app.json 第 64 页) + 红娘工作台申请/列表/撤销
- admin-web「联系授权审批」tab(审批岗队列+本人授权撤销,枚举码中文映射)

验证:mvn verify 895/895(3 skip)、UI 契约 24/24(64 页)、后端契约门禁 228/CURATED 20、小程序真编译 87 WXML 0 失败;负向注入 5(工程师)+2(QA 不同落点)判红→还原复绿;QA 抓 disclose 键数收敛断言缺口已补并回归;QA fresh eyes PASS 0 P0/P1
2026-10-11 13:08:02 +08:00
WorkBuddy 1be0d98ebd ZC-MM-006 审计与权限回收(阶段4)
- T01: V055 audit_logs 扩展 4 字段(purpose_code/service_assignment_id/actor_role_snapshot/request_trace_id, 全可空幂等) + AuditLog/DataScopeGuard/AuthorizationAuditListener/MatchmakerServiceService 写入链路改造 + schema-h2 同步 + LATEST_MIGRATION 54→55
- T02: JwtAuthFilter 运营分支改实时查库权限回收(每请求查 operators.status + 权限, 停用即401/撤权即403, 零缓存, claims 权限降级只写不读), 不碰 SecurityConfig/JwtTokenService/用户端
- T03: getServiceDetail 持有人分支接入 SensitiveAccessLog(成功查看落行 dataType=matchmaker_service_detail, 拒绝路径只落 audit_logs DATA_SCOPE_DENIED, 双记录结构性互斥)
- T04: 写接口 404 统一防探测(transfer/revoke/end/recommend/followup/complete/转介范围违规 404 化 deny, 先审计后 404, create/assign 无资源寻址维持 403, ReferralService 消灭裸 IllegalArgumentException)
- T05: OperatorEndpointPermissionCoverageTest +3 守卫(类级 RequestMapping 前缀合成/缺类级则逐方法 PreAuthorize/matchmaker+referral 禁 PatchMapping) + run-backend-contracts CURATED 14→18
- 新增测试 4 类 20 用例: MatchmakerAuditFieldsTest / OperatorPermissionRevocationTest / MatchmakerSensitiveAccessAuditTest / MatchmakerWriteDenyUniformityTest
- 验证: mvn verify 884/884(3 skip) + UI 契约 24/24 + 后端契约门禁 198 通过; 负向注入 5(工程师)+2(QA) 判红→还原复绿; QA fresh eyes 独立验收 PASS(0 P0/P1, 2 P2 观察项移交 ZC-MM-007)
- ContactAuthorizationPolicy 维持 DEFERRED; C 端死代码退役评估 3 项留待 007/专项治理
2026-10-11 09:19:01 +08:00
WorkBuddy 861c78efb5 feat(matchmaker): ZC-MM-002 A1 服务对象分配建模(DEC-MATCHMAKER-002 LOCKED 落地)
数据库(V053/V054):
- 新表 matchmaker_assignments:独立分配关系(assigned_by/reason/scope/
  expires_at/ended_at/end_reason),状态机 active/ended/revoked/transferred/
  expired(CHECK 白名单),部分唯一索引防同用户多 ACTIVE 主责分配,
  存量进行中服务单幂等回填
- 新角色 matchmaker_leader(014) + 新权限 matchmaker.team.assign(10000000-…-023);
  组长授 view/service/team.assign(不给平台级 matchmaker.assign)

后端:
- ServiceAssignmentPolicy 有效分配判定器(读前惰性过期,失效分配即时拒绝)
- 分配/转分配/撤销/结束四操作:状态机非法转换拒绝、理由必填、
  同用户主责冲突拒绝;组织范围校验(team.assign 同组织,NULL=NULL 视为
  平台直属,技术默认安全值待治理登记);transfer 同时校验原持有人与新目标范围
- 全操作审计 MATCHMAKER_ASSIGNMENT_CREATE/TRANSFER/REVOKE/END,
  operatorId=当前操作者,afterData 仅记摘要(无敏感内容)
- 删除认领端点 POST /services/{id}/claim(A1 禁止普通红娘认领,MM-AUTH-004=404)
- GET /pending 收敛为分配权持有者(assign or team.assign);
  dashboard today/completed 改本人口径,inProgress 口径修正 'processing'→'in_service'
- recommend/followup/complete/detail 归属判定接入判定器,拒绝走
  DataScopeGuard(自动 DATA_SCOPE_DENIED 审计),不再裸 IllegalStateException;
  assignService 与创建分配同事务联动;删除死查询 findAssignedTo

前端:
- admin-web 分配弹窗去硬编码假数据(operator_wang/chen)→ assignable-matchmakers
  真实接口(仅 id/name/organizationId,无联系方式)+ 理由必填;
  队列 tab 按 assign/team.assign 显隐;新增「服务对象分配」tab(转分配/撤销/结束)
- 小程序红娘工作台:删除接单入口,数据源切 GET /operator/matchmaker/assignments/my,
  枚举码不上屏(中文映射),空 serviceId 不跳转

测试:
- MatchmakerAssignmentA1Test 14 用例(MM-AUTH-001~004、MM-AUDIT-001、
  MM-LIFECYCLE-001、组长跨组织拒绝、NULL=NULL 平台直属边界、transfer 原持有人
  范围负向、/pending 403+审计),负向注入自证有效
- MatchmakerAssignmentPermissionTest 3 用例(端点权限契约 + claim 残留扫描)
- MatchmakerServiceTest 补 assignment 状态/scope 白名单守卫;迁移基线 LATEST=54
- 验证:定向 38/38 全绿;UI 契约 24/24;小程序 wcc/wcsc 真编译 0 失败
2026-10-09 22:46:32 +08:00
WorkBuddy 4edb7619bc fix(admin-web,db): 红娘菜单权限码对齐后端真实码 + 红娘角色授权
CI/CD Pipeline / Backend Build & Test (push) Canceled after 0s
CI/CD Pipeline / Admin Web Build (push) Canceled after 0s
CI/CD Pipeline / Mini Program Compile Check (push) Canceled after 0s
CI/CD Pipeline / Migration Validation (push) Canceled after 0s
CI/CD Pipeline / Test Shell Guard (Phase 23 Gate) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI/CD Pipeline / UI Contracts (source-structure gates) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI/CD Pipeline / E2E (live stack) (push) Canceled after 0s
前端菜单/路由守卫用 referral.manage、matchmaker.service.view,但后端 permissions
表不存在这两个码(referral 控制器要 matchmaker.service、红娘控制器要
matchmaker.view/service/assign)。visibleNavigation 据此把「公益红娘」「红娘服务」
两个菜单对**所有角色(含 super_admin)隐藏**。

- admin-web: MainLayout.vue(菜单 + 角色名判定)、router/index.ts(路由 meta)、
  stores/auth.ts(DEV 预览角色)三处对齐为后端真实 authority 码。
- db: 新增 V052 迁移,将 matchmaker.view/service/assign 授予 matchmaker 角色
  (005),修复「角色定义!=可用」同族缺陷;幂等 ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING。
- 重建 danyang-admin-web 镜像并重新部署;运行时验证 wanghongniang 登录返回
  [matchmaker.assign, matchmaker.service, matchmaker.view],两菜单可见。
2026-10-09 19:33:40 +08:00
WorkBuddy 60c591fc68 V1.0.1 纠偏 DoD 补齐:canonical key 字面化(V051+KEY_ALIASES)+ 照片并发突破实测(锁用户行+锁后计数)+ AGENTS 规则27 + known-risks
按文档 DoD/约束逐条复查后补齐的差距(承接 438b38d 主体纠偏):
- CFG-001 字面化:FeatureFlagConfig.KEY_ALIASES(identity.liveness.enabled / 遗留
  livenessVerification.enabled → 实现字段 livenessEnabled,读兼容)+ Controller PUT/DELETE
  落库归一到 canonical 键 + V051 迁移(删遗留键、写入 identity.liveness.enabled=false);
  MigrationValidationTest 基线 50→51。
- PHOTO-004 真实并发突破:新增 PhotoLimitConcurrencyGuardTest(3 线程 H2 并发冲顶)——
  实测咬住「锁照片行+读时计数」在 H2 MVCC 快照漏读、3/3 全成功突破上限的缺陷;
  并发控制改为锁用户行(UserMapper.lockUserRow FOR UPDATE)+ 锁后新语句 COUNT,
  0 张照片亦有锁可加(补首张并发缺口);UserPhotoMapper 计数方法同步替换。
- FF-LIVENESS-003 + canonical 持久化:FeatureFlagPersistenceGuardTest +4
  (canonical 加载 / 遗留别名读兼容 / PUT 落 canonical 键 / 切换即生效无旧缓存)、
  FeatureFlagControllerTest +3(canonical/legacy/reset)。
- 文档同步:AGENTS.md 规则 27(配置治理纪律);docs/governance/known-risks.md
  (7 项含本机 WSL/Docker 故障 KR-07);config-register / open-questions 更新 canonical 口径;
  STATUS rc.21 行补 ⑥⑦⑧。

全量回归 741/0/0/3(基线 717 + 25 新增 − 1 删死测试,宿主机 JDK21+Maven 3.9.9 实测,
本机 WSL/Docker 引擎故障期间);UI 契约门禁 18/18
2026-09-21 11:13:14 +08:00
WorkBuddy 438b38d121 V1.0.1 配置与规则纠偏:照片上限配置化+强校验 / 活体开关闭环 / 推荐阈值快照+规则版本化 / governance 三表+漂移审计
根治三类工程治理问题(技术默认值≠产品规则、配置存在但未闭环、文档代码漂移):
- PROFILE-001:profile.photo.maxCount(默认6未确认)+ ProfilePolicy + 服务器端 FOR UPDATE
  并发强校验(PHOTO_LIMIT_EXCEEDED,拒绝先于 S3 不留孤儿)+ 前端 mergeAppConfig 嵌套键修复
- CFG-001/IDENTITY-001:IdentityPolicy + GET /verification/liveness-status 真实判定点
  (默认关不阻断,开则 enhancedVerified 变化,消除假开关)+ 删死 seed livenessVerification.enabled
- MATCH-001:阈值60定为技术默认(消解 PENDING 矛盾)+ V050 recommendation_records.threshold_snapshot
  规则版本化 + 删死重复配置类 MatchConfig
- DOC-001:新增 docs/governance/(config-register/open-questions/decision-register/
  hardcoded-rule-audit/config-drift-audit)
- TEST-001:新增守卫 PhotoLimitGuardTest(8)/IdentityLivenessGuardTest(5)/
  RecommendationThresholdSnapshotGuardTest(4),均经负向注入可红

全量回归 733/0/0/3(基线717+17新增-1删死测试);UI 契约门禁 18/18;STATUS 升 rc.21
2026-09-21 02:05:15 +08:00
WorkBuddy 6e76e2f2ea feat(account): 数据保留流程落地(36 个月下限,V049)—— closed_at + 人工审核/幂等匿名化/审计 + 运营端点 + 守卫 5 用例;测试库补 user_photos,MyBatis null 更新修复 2026-09-20 22:30:29 +08:00
WorkBuddy d605c04707 feat(flags): PUT /operator/feature-flags 真持久化(V048)
此前 updateFlag 只改 FeatureFlagConfig 内存单例的字段:重启即回默认值、
多实例互不一致,表现为「后台显示已关闭,一次发布后功能又回来了」。

- V048 新建 feature_flag_overrides(flag_key 主键;值存字符串、回读按字段
  声明类型解析;updated_by 记审计)。updated_by 必须建 uuid 而非 varchar,
  否则 UUIDStringTypeHandler 以 uuid 发参数会在 PG 抛
  operator does not exist: character varying = uuid(同 V046 的 actor_id)。
- FeatureFlagOverride/Mapper/Service:upsert 走「先 UPDATE、0 行再 INSERT」,
  不用 PG 的 ON CONFLICT(H2 测试库不认,同 IdempotencyMapper 取舍)。
- FeatureFlagConfig.reloadFromPersistence() 挂 @PostConstruct:该时机晚于
  @ConfigurationProperties 绑定,故 DB 覆盖压得住 yml 默认值。
- PUT 先改内存再落库(内存改动失败即 400,不写库);新增 DELETE 恢复默认。
- 覆盖值无法解析时启动 fail-fast,不静默回退默认(否则「配了不生效」)。

守卫 FeatureFlagPersistenceGuardTest 11 例,核心是「另起实例重新加载后改动仍在」
(重启等价路径),并自检 @PostConstruct 未被摘掉。
负向验证:注入不落库 + 摘钩子 -> 恰好 5 例变红,其余不受影响;还原 md5 一致。

全量回归 700 / 0 / 0 / 3(起点 689,净 +11);UI 契约门禁 18/18。
2026-09-19 17:47:16 +08:00
WorkBuddy d9c08d85f9 feat(privacy): 键集以小程序为准 —— V047 补列 + 接通 /account/privacy-settings 桩
产品裁定:隐私设置键集**以小程序为准**,用迁移补齐后端缺失列。

V047 新增 allow_activity_invitation(默认 TRUE)与 show_last_online(默认 FALSE)。
默认值**不对称**,与小程序 data 初值严格一致 —— showLastOnline 写成 TRUE 等于默认公开用户在线状态。
既有 6 列保留不动:UserProfileService 的资料详情 DTO 仍在全量返回它们(第 74-79 行),
那是仍在生效的独立读取出口。本迁移只做加法,不做替换。

AccountLifecycleService 的两个 TODO 桩改为委托 PrivacyService 真实读写。
这是**用户真正走的路径**(小程序调 /account/privacy-settings,而 /me/* 与 /profile/* 无人调用),
此前「保存成功」只是回 {updated:true} 而从不落库。

入参校验:已知键类型错误必须显式抛错,未知键宽容忽略 ——
若静默丢弃,用户会看到「保存成功」而设置从未生效,这类缺陷最难排查。
另容错 Boolean 的字符串形式("true"/"false")。

test(privacy): PrivacySettingsUpsertGuardTest 扩至 8 用例,其中 2 个是契约守卫

契约守卫**直接解析小程序源文件**的 PUT payload 与 data 块得出权威键集/默认值,
不抄契约副本(沿用 EntityMigrationParityTest 的纪律)—— 小程序改键即变红。
① 键集:后端返回键必须与小程序 PUT payload 键完全一致(不多不少)
② 默认值:后端默认值必须与小程序 data 初值一致(含 showLastOnline=false 这条不对称项)
③ 桩已接通:经 /account/privacy-settings 写入必须真落库且可读回
④ 已知键传错类型必须报错,不得静默丢弃
其余 4 个为 upsert 行为守卫(连续两次更新不炸且不产生第二行 / 部分更新不重置 / 默认值 / 读取无副作用)。

负向注入:把桩退回「不落库」→ 恰 2 红(③ 与 ④),其余 6 个正确未红。已还原并复跑全绿。

test(deployment): MigrationValidationTest 基线 46 → 47

新增迁移必须同步更新 LATEST_MIGRATION,否则全量回归报「版本号超出当前基线」。
该守卫同时断言「迁移文件总数 == 基线」(不允许缺号),是有效守卫 ——
正确做法是更新常量,不要为了让测试变绿而改断言方式。
2026-09-19 17:11:46 +08:00
WorkBuddy 69cf6a2cc7 feat(idempotency): 为 30 个写端点实现 Idempotency-Key
规范第八章要求 7 类写端点支持 Idempotency-Key,第 146 章验收口径为
「最终不能生成重复核心数据」。检修前的实际状态:后端零处读取该头,
小程序 25 处调用点发送全部石沉大海。

一处实现、零业务代码改动、逐端点声明:
- V045 新建 idempotency_records + 唯一索引 uk_idempotency_scope
- V046 修正 actor_id 列类型 VARCHAR -> uuid(见下)
- IdempotencyInterceptor:先占位后执行 / 重放首次响应 / 处理中回 409 /
  孤儿占位 300s 可接管 / 失败释放占位
- IdempotencyResponseCacheFilter:缓存响应体供逐字节重放
- WebMvcConfig:本项目第一个通用 WebMvcConfigurer
- @Idempotent 声明 30 处(含补 CheckinController 手工签到的漏标)
- GlobalExceptionHandler:IllegalStateException(30 处业务状态冲突)与
  DuplicateKeyException(并发重复提交的最后防线)此前均无映射 → 落 500,
  而 500 的语义是「可重试」,调用方于是重试并制造更多重复。现映射为 409;
  刻意不映射父类 DataIntegrityViolationException(CHECK 违反应由 500 暴露)。
- schema-h2.sql 补 idempotency_records

V046 的必要性:项目全局注册的 UUIDStringTypeHandler 对任何合法 UUID 形式的
String 参数以显式 uuid 类型发送,而 SQL 侧 stringtype=unspecified 只影响以
unknown 类型发送的参数,覆盖不到它。因此真正的不变量不是「JDBC 参数配好了」,
而是「列类型必须是 uuid」。V045 初版把 actor_id 建成 VARCHAR(64) 时,
带幂等键的请求在真实 PG 上全部 500。

全库扫描确认该不变量已收敛:所有 *_id VARCHAR 列中 actor_id 是唯一违规,
client_message_id / provider_request_id 为外部 id,
resource_id / source_id 在 Java 侧零处作查询条件。
2026-09-18 16:37:11 +08:00
WorkBuddy 730dddde30 test(e2e): Phase 23B — rebuild E2E infrastructure; fix 6 real prod defects it exposed
Phase 23 closed as PARTIAL: fake coverage was gone, but the E2E layer itself
was still empty — no conftest.py anywhere, ~15 fixtures that never existed,
6 files crashing at import on os.environ["E2E_PASSWORD"], and CI never ran E2E.
STATUS's "10 E2E files / ~80+ cases ✅" described files that had never executed.

Infrastructure delivered:
- tests/e2e/conftest.py: ApiClient (trust_env=False — a host http_proxy turns
  localhost calls into 502), operator_token(username) / new_user / admin_token
  fixtures, and a session probe that calls pytest.exit(4) when the stack is
  unreachable. NOT skip: skip would launder "did not run" into "passed".
- pytest.ini, tests/e2e/requirements.txt, and tests/e2e/sql/
  seed_e2e_operators.sql — migrations contain NO operator seed at all, so a
  fresh database has zero logins; the seed creates 6 e2e accounts with role
  bindings, idempotent, password injected via `psql -v pwd`.
- CI job `e2e`: compose up -> poll /health/live (timeout = fail) -> seed ->
  pytest -> always teardown. Gate D-23-D is now closed.
- 8 E2E files migrated off import-time env reads; tautological assertions
  (`x == t or not x`), a counselor token standing in for content_editor, and a
  bare `status_code == 200` claiming to prove INV-020 were replaced with real
  permission/behavior assertions.

Six real production defects found only by running against real PostgreSQL
(H2 has zero coverage for all of them):
- D-23B-A (Critical): stale V042__add_appointment_operator_register_permission.sql
  left in target/classes; src had replaced it with V042__add_service_location_
  announcements.sql. Packing without clean put two V042 in the jar -> Flyway
  "Found more than one migration with version 042" -> app would not start.
  Guard added: testBuildOutputHasNoDuplicateMigrationVersions scans build output
  (src is clean, so only this catches it).
- D-23B-B (High): non-UUID path variable reached the DB -> 500 + leaked
  `invalid input syntax for type uuid`. Now rejected at the controller.
- D-23B-C (High): 6 E2E files raised KeyError at import -> never collected.
- D-23B-E (Critical): permissions = 48, role_permissions for super_admin = 18,
  matchmaker = 0. V015's "grant all to super_admin" was a point-in-time snapshot;
  the 30 permissions added later were never granted. On a fresh stack an admin
  cannot create a service station and matchmakers can do nothing. V044 restores
  super_admin to its documented definition (not an expansion); the matchmaker
  permission set needs a product decision and is left as a residual.
- D-23B-I (Medium): IllegalArgumentException (e.g. invalid activity type) was
  unmapped -> 500. Now BAD_REQUEST.
- D-23B-J (High): `operator does not exist: uuid = character varying` — Java
  ids are String, columns are uuid, PostgreSQL does not implicitly cast in
  comparisons. Fixed at the source with JDBC `stringtype=unspecified` (docker
  profile); production datasource comes from deploy env and needs the same.

One judgement retracted: an initial read suggested service_appointment.register
was missing. It is not — the endpoint uses service.assisted_registration, seeded
in V029, and the code deliberately avoids a duplicate permission. Nothing was
changed on that basis.

Verification: 33 E2E passed against a live stack; unreachable stack and a
missing operator password both exit 4 (never skip/pass); backend regression
656 / 0 failures / 0 errors / 3 skipped (baseline 655, +1 guard, negatively
validated by injecting a duplicate V042 -> exactly one test turned red).
2026-09-18 13:50:19 +08:00
WorkBuddy 22c778b111 fix(analytics): close Phase 20 KEEP-VERIFY — 20 defects (fake metric definitions, hardcoded zeros, systemic soft-delete leak, module-wide 403, fake-green tests); add MetricCatalog + unified calculator + V043 grants + 51 guard tests; full regression 648 green
口径造假:
- D1 实名人数用 user_profiles.profile_status != 'rejected' 冒充 → in_progress/need_edit 被算成已实名
- D3 Chat Started 直接数会话行数 → system/risk_notice 系统通知计入
- D4 Match 不分来源 → 活动 10 对互选被当 10 对成功引用(Gate)
- D6 Banner 曝光/点击硬编码 0 → 改返回 null + NOT_INSTRUMENTED 标记

死代码 / 占位:
- D5 活动漏斗全部硬编码 0 + 一行把"用户数"当"活动数"的死代码
- D20 getDailySummary(days) 无边界校验

系统性软删缺陷(D12):
- BaseEntity.deletedAt 无 @TableLogic 且全局无逻辑删除配置
  → selectCount 把软删数据全部计入统计且无任何报错
- 修复 45 处统计调用显式 deleted_at IS NULL(2 轮复验,首轮漏扫 5 处次级路径:
  服务用户数分域明细 / 服务站统计 / 性别与年龄分布)

结构类:
- D15 Dashboard/用户漏斗/专项页各实现一遍同名指标且互不相同 → 抽 AnalyticsMetricsCalculator 统一口径

权限(Gate ⑩):
- data_viewer 在 V001 定义却全仓从未授权(空壳角色)
- platform_admin 的 V015 扩展条件 id >= '20000000-…' 漏掉 V1.0 老权限段
  → 整个 Analytics 模块除 super_admin 外全员 403
- V043 授予两角色;刻意不授予 organization_admin(相关表无组织维度,无范围全量即越权)

假绿测试:
- 删除 AnalyticsServiceTest(5× assertTrue(true),零断言)

新增:
- 指标字典 MetricCatalog(36 指标 × 12 字段)+ MetricStatus/MetricDefinition + docs/ANALYTICS_METRICS.md
- 守卫 51 用例:MetricCatalogGuardTest(11) / AnalyticsMetricsPhase20IntegrationTest(21)
  / AnalyticsSoftDeleteGuardTest(4,结构性) / AnalyticsPermissionGrantTest(6)
  / LocalEligibilityStatusVocabularyGuardTest(9)

跨阶段修复(缺陷本体属账号生命周期模块,按"发现即修"处理):
- X1(Critical)注销写入 user_identities 状态域的 'failed' → 违反生产 V017 chk_elig_verify_status
  → 真实 PG 上 closeAccount 事务回滚、账号注销 100% 不可用(负向验证实测 DataIntegrityViolation)
- X2 checkCanWithdraw 资格拦截用 submitted/pending(该表永不可能出现)→ 死代码
- X3 测试库补 chk_elig_type/chk_elig_verify_status,暴露 ActivityPhase14Test 夹具违规

验证:
- 负向验证两轮共 7 处注入 → 7 个用例精准变红且无无关失败(一处被源码结构+运行时行为两层捕获)
- 还原后 md5sum 逐字节一致,NEG-VAL 残留 0
- 后端全量 648 tests / 0 failures / 0 errors / BUILD SUCCESS;admin-web vue-tsc EXIT=0
2026-09-17 23:25:31 +08:00
WorkBuddy 72b4e9b846 fix(ops-backend/service-station): close Phase 19 KEEP-VERIFY — 25 defects (unreachable announcements + station write privilege escalation; banner 500 + soft-delete leak; content publish dead-end; program approval dead-end/draft leak/zero counts/missing withdraw; zero-coverage test schema) ; add V042 announcement chain + 34 guard tests; full regression 602 green
Backend
- Service Station: expose the 「临时公告」 chain end-to-end (V042 table/service existed
  but had ZERO endpoints -> both admin and miniapp could never reach it): 5 operator
  endpoints (list/create/update/publish/archive) + 1 user-facing read endpoint.
- Fix privilege escalation: create/update were guarded only by the class-level
  service_location.view, making V015's service_location.manage a never-used dead
  permission -> read-only roles could edit stations. Permissions moved to method level.
- Add ServiceLocationOperatorController to OperatorEndpointPermissionCoverageTest
  (it was NOT scanned, which is why the escalation stayed invisible).
- Add create/update validation (address NOT NULL + status CHECK only blew up on PG).
- Banner: validation failures threw bare RuntimeException -> 500; now VALIDATION_ERROR
  -> 400. Add deleted_at IS NULL to both home queries (soft-deleted banners stayed live).
- Content: operator list/detail split (admin «publish» was a dead end because it reused
  the published-only public API); category deactivate/reactivate; article body on edit.
- Service Program: operator member list now includes pending (approval reachable);
  active-only public visibility (draft leak); memberCount/pendingCount aggregation;
  withdraw/removeMember; reuse row on re-apply (UNIQUE(program_id,user_id) crash).
- MeController: add the missing GET /me/service-history route.

Schema / guards
- schema-h2.sql: add service_location_announcements (+ chk_announcement_status) and
  content_categories (+ uk_content_category_code, chk_category_status); move both into
  REQUIRED_IN_TEST_SCHEMA. MigrationValidationTest baseline 41 -> 42.
- V11PermissionMatrixContractTest now scans ALL migrations instead of hardcoding V015+V029.
- New: ServiceLocationAnnouncementPhase19IntegrationTest (24),
  ServiceLocationControllerPermissionContractTest (5),
  ServiceLocationAnnouncementConstraintParityTest (5, prod DDL <-> test schema <->
  backend whitelist <-> admin labels).

Frontend
- admin-web: ServiceStationView gains announcement management (statuses, create/edit,
  publish/archive with confirm, expiry); write buttons gated by service_location.manage.
- miniapp: U50 renders the 临时公告 block via new serviceStationService; page no longer
  talks to utils/api directly; announcement failure degrades to [] instead of erroring.
- ui-tests: U37 four-group + U50 announcement contracts; /home assertion retargeted to
  the service layer.

Verification
- Negative verification: 3 injected defects (drop soft-delete filter / drop test-schema
  CHECK / downgrade write endpoint to view) -> 4 named tests fail precisely, no
  collateral failures; restored, NEG-VAL residue = 0.
- Backend full regression: 602 tests, 0 failures, 0 errors, 3 skipped (baseline 420).
- admin-web: vue-tsc --noEmit EXIT=0, vite build EXIT=0. Miniapp: tsc --noEmit EXIT=0.
- ui-tests 14/14 PASS.
2026-09-17 22:21:31 +08:00
WorkBuddy 556f95a562 fix(activity-mutual): close Phase 16 KEEP-VERIFY/EXTEND — 7 defects + 1 hidden compile defect (reopenEpisode) + 1 test-fidelity; unify dual-impl to confirmActivityInterest; INV-006 fix; +7 tests (481 green) 2026-09-17 16:47:10 +08:00
WorkBuddy 29112eed6e fix(activity): close Phase 15 KEEP-VERIFY/EXTEND — 2 critical + 14 other defects, 3 test-fidelity fixes
Phase 15 (activity registration / review / checkin) verification closure.

Two CRITICAL defects, both "production always had it, test schema never did":
- D1: generateCheckinToken wrote the token to Redis with value "used", while
  scanCheckin rejects any token marked "used" -> every freshly issued check-in
  code was dead on arrival, staff scanning failed 100% of the time.
  Issuing now writes "issued"; "used" is set only after a successful scan.
- D9: UNIQUE(activity_id, user_id) exists in production, but re-registering
  after cancel/reject went through INSERT -> users who cancelled once could
  never register for that activity again (duplicate key 500). The H2 test
  schema lacked the UNIQUE, so the path had zero coverage. Now the original
  row is reused via an atomic conditional UPDATE.

Checkin (D2-D8):
- D2: duplicate check-in was read-then-write; now atomic checkinIfNotCheckedIn
  and repeat scans are idempotent (alreadyCheckedIn) without duplicate audit.
- D3: no data scope at all -> added activity staff assignment (V040) and
  assertCheckinScope; INV-020 (org relation grants nothing).
- D4: manualCheckin did not validate activity existence/cancellation.
- D5: getCheckinStats NPE on missing activity; remainingCount was semantically
  "free seats" -> replaced with notCheckedInCount.
- D6: malformed timestamp caused 500 -> 400. D7: constant-time signature compare.

Registration / review / cancel (D10-D13):
- D10: backend registration list only queried status='approved' -> the review
  screen never saw pending rows (review unusable).
- D11: registration_start_at / registration_end_at were never enforced.
- D12: cancel had no audit log (the only write without one).
- D13: reject/cancel were read-then-full-update -> rejectIfPending/cancelIfActive.

Capacity groups (D14, plan item 2): groups were stored and read back but never
participated in capacity -> incrementIfAvailable / decrementIfPositive now make
approved_count real; activities without groups are unaffected.

Frontend contract (F1-F2):
- F1: admin-web had no check-in surface at all -> ActivityCheckinView.vue
  (paste/scan token, manual check-in, stats) + /activities/checkin route & nav.
- F2: miniapp had no cancel-registration wrapper although the endpoint existed.

Test fidelity (T1-T3):
- T1: test schema gained UNIQUE(activity_id,user_id) + chk_reg_status +
  chk_checkin_status; two new guards parse the real V010 DDL and compare.
- T2: 3 assertTrue(true) placeholders in CheckinServiceTest (covering duplicate
  check-in, expiry, no-sensitive-plaintext) replaced with 5 real guards that
  parse the real source and real production DDL.
- T3: activity_registrations + activity_staff_assignments moved into
  REQUIRED_IN_TEST_SCHEMA; MigrationValidationTest baseline 39 -> 40.

Note: ActivityStaffAssignment must NOT extend BaseEntity - the table is a
composite PK (activity_id, operator_id); BaseEntity would add id/updated_at/
deleted_at to every INSERT and break on PostgreSQL (caught by
EntityMigrationParityTest immediately).

Tests: ActivityPhase15Test (21), CheckinServiceTest (5), 2 new constraint
guards. Negative verification: 3 injected defects -> 8 assertions turned red,
all restored.

Regression: 474 tests / 0 failures / 0 errors / 3 skipped / BUILD SUCCESS
(baseline 450). admin-web vue-tsc 0 error, vite build OK.
2026-09-17 15:07:52 +08:00
WorkBuddy 7a2693b239 fix(counseling): close Phase 13A KEEP-VERIFY/EXTEND — 9 real defects + 4 test-infra defects
Phase 13A(婚恋咨询与婚前辅导)复验关闭。历史 ✅ 不可信:counseling 模块存在双实现,
线上权威 CounselingService(167 行)零测试,唯一被测的 CounselingServiceApp(280 行)
是孤儿类(无注入点、无 HTTP 端点可达,生产永不执行)→ 已合并并删除。

生产缺陷(D1~D9):
- D1 Critical 生产故障 · INV-013 泄露:咨询正文 userRequestSummary 原文被写入 WARN 日志
  (同 Phase 10 D2 一族)→ 改为只记 serviceId + riskLevel,绝不记正文。
- D2 High 越权:申请 userId 取自请求体而非认证主体 → Controller 强制 principal.id()。
- D3 High 并发:分配用「先读后写」→ 两管理员并发分配静默覆盖;
  改 assignIfPending 条件更新(WHERE status='pending' AND assigned_operator_id IS NULL),
  affectedRows=0 明确报错。
- D4 High 越权读:counseling_manager 经 getDetail 可读 followups 正文 → INV-013 绕过通道;
  manager 只加回 userRequestSummary,不装配 followups。
- D5 Medium:无状态机 → 「已完成」可被再取消;新增 ALLOWED_TRANSITIONS + assertTransition。
- D6 Medium 生产故障:GET /counseling/services/intro 后端不存在(且被 /services/{id} 吞掉)
  → 小程序 intro 页 100% 无数据;补端点并声明在变量路径之前。
- D7 Medium 契约:Admin 调用 5 条不存在的 /services/operator/*(404)+ 缺四态
  → 后端补 8 个运营端端点(@PreAuthorize),前端整体重写 + 注册 /counseling 路由。
- D8 Medium 契约:小程序字段名错(userRequestSummary/preferredServiceMode)+ 无幂等
  + my-counseling 未检查 success(403 静默空列表)+ 跳转不存在的页 + WXML 内调用方法。
- D9 Medium 测试保真度:测试库 counseling 两表零 CHECK 约束,
  counseling_services 未列入 EntityMigrationParityTest 任何集合(= 零覆盖)。

测试基建缺陷(T1~T4,不修即恒真假绿):
- T1 守卫找不到 DDL:surefire workingDirectory = ${project.basedir}/.. 使 CWD 为仓库根,
  且 backend/ 是子目录非祖先 → 改为候选后缀 + 逐级向上定位,失败大声抛异常。
- T2 全限定 @com.baomidou...TableField(exist=false) 漏解析(假漂移警报)→ 正则放宽 + 回归守卫。
- T3 OperatorEndpointPermissionCoverageTest 扫到私有辅助方法(假阳性)→ 只扫描真实端点 + 自检。
- T4 两处测试自身逻辑缺陷:陈旧内存快照比较、Instant 纳秒 vs DB 微秒精度。

迁移:新增 V039(counseling 幂等键 + 三个 CHECK 白名单显式固化),基线 38 → 39。

负向验证两轮(均已还原,grep -c NEG-VAL = 0):
- ① DDL 常量守卫:从 V039 移除 'scheduled' → 常量守卫精准变红
  (证明解析的是真实 DDL 而非副本)。
- ② 行为守卫:注入「并发回退先读后写 / manager 读 followups / 状态机守卫失效」
  → 三个用例各自精准变红。

测试:新增 CounselingPhase13ATest(25)+ CounselingConstraintGuardTest(5,解析真实 DDL);
删除孤儿类及其 3 个 DTO、删除测死代码的 CounselingDataScopeTest。
全量回归:Tests run: 420, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 3 / BUILD SUCCESS(4:49)。
基线 391 → 420(净 +29)。admin-web vue-tsc EXIT=0;miniapp tsc EXIT=0。

Tag: phase13a-recovery-2026-09-17
Report: docs/Phase-13A-V11-Recovery-Completion-Report-2026-09-17.md
2026-09-17 01:25:12 +08:00
WorkBuddy 5b3bad326e fix(matchmaker,referral): close Phase 13 KEEP-VERIFY/EXTEND — 7 real defects
KEEP-VERIFY/EXTEND 复验(历史 ✅ 不可信;测试覆盖函数 ≠ 覆盖运行时路径)。
逐条核对运行时路径与生产约束后修复 7 处缺陷,其中 3 处「只在真实 PostgreSQL 上炸」。

D1 (Critical, 生产故障)
  matchmaker_recommendations.status 代码写 liked/passed/confirmed_mutual,
  而 V009 chk_rec_status 只允许 pending_view/viewed/responded 且从未扩展
  → 真实 PG 上用户接受/跳过推荐必崩。测试库未复刻该 CHECK,故长期静默。

D2 (Critical, 生产故障)
  控制器缺省 serviceType="recommendation" 不在 chk_matchmaker_service_type
  白名单 → 提交红娘服务必崩。
  D1+D2 同修于新增 V038__align_matchmaker_status_constraints.sql
  (沿用 V018/V020/V025 的 DROP CONSTRAINT IF EXISTS + 重加白名单惯例)。

D3 (High, 越权写)
  MatchmakerServiceService.recommendPartner 无 assignedOperatorId 归属校验,
  且可把用户推荐给自己 → 补校验 + 禁止自我推荐。

D4 (High, 越权读)
  getServiceDetail 无归属校验且返回完整用户资料(userId/description/
  userProfile/followups)→ 签名加 requesterId,按调用者返回完整/脱敏视图。

D5 (High, 越权写)
  ReferralService 的 userId 取自请求体且零授权校验 → 新增
  assertMatchmakerServesUser,在 referToServiceStation/referToActivity 入口
  强制校验存在进行中的服务关系。

D6 (High, 生产故障)
  MatchmakerFollowupMapper.findByServiceId 只有声明无 @Select
  → Invalid bound statement (not found),getServiceDetail 必崩。
  该缺陷由本轮新增测试首次暴露(历史测试从未调用该路径)→ 补 @Select。

D7 (Medium, 契约缺口)
  admin-web 5 处 API 缺口(4 条 404 + C 端端点被运营端误用)+ 小程序缺转介服务层
  → 后端补 GET /operator/matchmaker/recommendations 与
  GET /referrals/operator/history 两个运营端端点;前端改路径、
  assign 改 POST + body operatorId;新增 miniapp/services/referralService.js。

测试保真度
  - 测试库补 matchmaker_services/recommendations/followups 三表(此前该模块零真实覆盖),
    约束与 V038 对齐;EntityMigrationParityTest 三表移入 REQUIRED_IN_TEST_SCHEMA;
    MigrationValidationTest LATEST_MIGRATION 37 → 38。
  - 新增 MatchmakerReferralPhase13Test(17 用例,@SpringBootTest 走真实方法路径 + 真实落库)。
  - 重写 MatchmakerServiceTest(6 用例):直接解析 db/migration/V*.sql,按文件名顺序应用
    DROP CONSTRAINT IF EXISTS + ADD CONSTRAINT 取"最终有效"白名单,并内置解析器自检。
    【关键】首版守卫硬编码白名单副本,注入 D1 后仍全绿(对漂移零反应)→ 必须解析真实 DDL。
  - 删除 3 处假测试占位(MatchmakerServiceTest.testMatchmakerCannotLike 的 assertTrue(true);
    CoreInvariantsTest INV-007 断言的是状态常量、INV-010 亦为 assertTrue(true)),
    已如实改名并注明行为验证位置。

负向验证(两轮)
  注入 D1(回退 chk_rec_status 白名单)→ 行为守卫 DataIntegrityViolation
  + 常量守卫 Multiple Failures (3 failures) → Tests run: 23, Failures: 1, Errors: 2
  / BUILD FAILURE,守卫有效性得证。缺陷已还原。

全量回归(离线容器,实测)
  [WARNING] Tests run: 391, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 3
  [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS / Total time: 04:59 min
  Phase 12 基线 371 → 391(净 +20)。

报告:docs/Phase-13-V11-Recovery-Completion-Report-2026-09-16.md
Phase 13A 未自动进入,等待用户确认。
2026-09-17 00:01:53 +08:00
WorkBuddy c607e87b45 fix(relationship): Phase 12 复验 —— 修复实体↔生产迁移系统性漂移(生产故障族)/ 双路径 episode 与 NPE / 测试库缺表致首页零覆盖 / 计划项 2 未实现
KEEP-VERIFY 复验发现并修复 4 处真实缺陷:
- D1(Critical,生产故障·同一族系统性缺陷)实体与 db/migration 系统性漂移:23 表 50 列在生产
  迁移中不存在,而测试库 schema-h2.sql 手写补齐 → 全量绿=假绿。其中 11 表属"INSERT 必崩"级
  (缺 id/created_at/updated_at,被 AutoFillHandler 强制填充),含 matches.episode、user_preferences
  权重列、permissions/roles、consent_records、risk_events 等;真实 PG 上 Match 创建、择偶偏好保存、
  权限/角色写入、同意记录、风险事件全部失败。修复:新增 V037(幂等 ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS
  + 存量 episode 回填)。
- D2(High)RelationshipService.createMatch 不写 episode/lastActivityAt,与 MatchService 双路径
  填充不一致;且 episode 为 null 时 m.getEpisode()+1 对 Integer 自动拆箱抛 NPE。修复:统一按
  AGENTS.md #20 推导 + null 兜底。
- D3(High)测试库缺 user_identities 等 7 表 → GET /api/v1/home 在测试环境 BadSqlGrammar,
  首页接口零回归覆盖。修复:schema-h2.sql 补齐 7 表。
- D4(Medium)Phase 12 计划项 2 实际未实现:getting_to_know 分支只产出 counseling。修复:
  HomeApplicationService 补 premarital 引导(与 counseling 并列)。

测试保真度:
- 新增永久守卫 EntityMigrationParityTest(5 用例):把"实体字段 ⊆ 生产迁移累积列"与"测试库覆盖
  关键业务表"固化为自动不变量,区分"必崩级/潜伏级";经两轮负向验证证明会变红(第一轮分级过窄
  已修正:episode 由"潜伏级"纠正为"必崩级")。
- 新增 RelationshipProgressPhase12Test(14 用例,含 8 线程并发确认)与
  HomePremaritalGuidancePhase12Test(5 用例)。
- 删除 2 个假测试类中的 assertTrue(true) 占位(AGENTS.md 明令禁止),改走真实服务方法验证。

Gate:单方确认不改变最终关系 ✅ / 双确认后才 successful ✅ / 历史 Episode 可追踪 ✅ /
新 Episode 不恢复旧聊天权限(conversations.match_id UNIQUE)✅ / 非成员不可代确认 ✅

全量回归:371 tests / 0 failures / 0 errors / 3 skipped / BUILD SUCCESS(71 类,5m07s)
2026-09-16 23:01:13 +08:00
WorkBuddy 52e11a6c65 fix(notification): Phase 11 复验 —— 修复通知类型违反生产 CHECK 约束(生产故障)/ 幂等无库兜底 / 婚前辅导通知未接线
复验模式:KEEP-VERIFY/EXTEND(不轻信历史 ✅,逐条核对运行时路径与生产约束)。

== D3(Critical · 生产故障)通知 type 全量违反生产 CHECK 约束 ==
NotificationService 的 10 个业务模板传入复合 type
(appointment_submitted / counseling_assigned / le_verified / referral_created 等),
而生产 V020__extend_notification_types.sql 的 chk_notification_type 白名单只允许 12 个短名。
真实 PostgreSQL 下这些通知全部落库失败;测试库 schema-h2.sql 未复刻该约束,故历史 334 测试全绿 → 假绿。
修复:
- type 归一为白名单短名,业务细分交由 businessType/title 承担:
  appointment_submitted|_confirmed|_changed -> appointment
  counseling_assigned|_scheduled|_completed  -> counseling
  premarital_scheduled                       -> premarital
  le_need_evidence|le_verified|le_rejected   -> local_eligibility
  referral_created                           -> matchmaker
- 重写 buildPrivacySafeCopy:原以复合 type 为 key 的 Map.ofEntries 归一后产生重复 key 会抛
  IllegalArgumentException(运行期崩溃),改为按短名 switch。
- schema-h2.sql 补齐生产 CHECK 约束(测试保真度下沉)。

== D1(High)通知幂等仅 SELECT-then-INSERT,无 DB 兜底 ==
NotificationMapper.findExisting 为查后插,并发下可重复落库。
修复:新增 V036__add_notification_idempotency_index.sql,建 partial unique index
uk_notification_business(user_id, type, business_type, business_id, content)
WHERE business_id IS NOT NULL(先按 created_at ASC 去重存量数据)。
schema-h2.sql 同步唯一索引(H2 无 partial index,标准 UNIQUE 对 NULL 多行共存语义等价)。

== D2(Medium)婚前辅导通知未接线 ==
premaritalScheduled 零调用;CounselingServiceApp.scheduleCounseling(P13A-T22 管理端路径)完全不发通知。
修复:CounselingService.schedule 与 CounselingServiceApp.scheduleCounseling 均按 service_type 分流,
premarital 走 premaritalScheduled,其余走 counselingScheduled;
管理端路径包 try/catch —— 通知失败不回滚排期事实。

== 测试(基线 334 → 346,+12) ==
- NotificationPhase11IntegrationTest(5):回滚不发通知(Gate 前半)、提交后可见、
  顺序重试幂等、绕过 findExisting 由唯一索引兜底抛异常且最终仅 1 条、business_id IS NULL 多行共存。
- NotificationPrivacyCopyTest(5):反射校验 4 类隐私文案,咨询类不含「咨询」且标题为「服务通知」,
  不泄露姓名/时间/证件类型;未知 type 安全回退;ALLOWED_TYPES 守卫。
- NotificationTemplateTypeGuardTest(2):关键 —— 调用模板方法本身(而非直接传字面量 send),
  断言 10 个模板全部以白名单短名落库。
- MigrationValidationTest:LATEST_MIGRATION 35 -> 36,DDL 校验补 CREATE UNIQUE INDEX 识别。

== 负向验证(两轮,含第一轮失效教训) ==
第一轮:注入复合 type 后 NotificationPhase11IntegrationTest 仍全绿 ——
  因该测试直接 send(..., "appointment", ...) 传字面量,不经过模板方法,属无效守卫。
第二轮:改为 NotificationTemplateTypeGuardTest 调用模板本身,注入后精准抛
  DataIntegrityViolation,守卫有效性得证。教训已写入报告:守卫必须经负向验证证明会变红。

== 证据 ==
全量回归 346 tests / 0 failures / 0 errors / 3 skipped / BUILD SUCCESS
(离线 Docker:danyang-match-backend-test:latest + 卷 danyang-m2-cache)
迁移校验 12/12;定向 19/19。

== Gate 判定 ==
回滚事务不发通知 ✅ | 通知失败不回滚核心事实 ✅ | 隐私安全文案 INV-010 ✅
已提交事务通知失败可重试且不产生重复业务记录 ✅(修复后成立)

== 遗留 gap(登记不自动实现) ==
sendExternal 在事务内同步执行外部副作用,当前为占位实现;接入真实微信推送前必须改为
@TransactionalEventListener(AFTER_COMMIT) / REQUIRES_NEW —— 全仓当前无任何 afterCommit 机制。
2026-09-16 21:50:56 +08:00
Codex 10887f40ed feat: add V034-V035 flyway migrations and phase 04-07 test classes 2026-09-14 10:01:50 +08:00
admin ac2327b499 chore: checkpoint before switching to main 2026-09-11 09:07:41 +08:00
admin d6f5f25c35 fix: repair admin page api contracts 2026-09-10 21:31:38 +08:00
admin 7994e081a6 fix: rebuild latest demo database 2026-09-10 20:28:29 +08:00
admin 5b51d5b3f1 feat: complete phase 02 RBAC and data scope recovery 2026-09-10 10:58:43 +08:00
admin b46b48eb33 chore: establish V1.1 recovery baseline 2026-09-09 22:05:00 +08:00